I’m reading bell hooks’s Teaching to Transgress (Routledge, 1994) for work, and the following passage stood out to me:
It is apparent that one of the primary reasons we have not experienced a revolution of values is that a culture of domination necessarily promotes addiction to lying and denial. That lying takes the presumably innocent form of may white people (and even some black folks) suggesting that racism does not exist anymore, and that conditions of social equality are solidly in place that would enable any black person who works hard to achieve economic self-sufficiency . . . Lying takes the form of mass media creating the myth that feminist movement has completely transformed society, so much so that the politics of patriarchal power have been inverted and that men, particularly white men, just like emasculated black men, have become the victims of dominating women. . . . Add to this the widely held assumptions that blacks, other minorities, and white women are taking jobs from white men, and that people are poor and unemployed because they want to be, and it becomes most evident that part of our contemporary crisis is created by a lack of meaningful access to the truth. That is to say, individuals are not just presented untruths, but are told them in a manner that enables most effective communication. When this collective cultural consumption of and attachment to misinformation is coupled with the layers of lying individuals do in their personal lives, our capacity to face reality is severely diminished as is our will to intervene and change unjust circumstances. (28-29)
The cultural touchstone that hooks mentions in this passage — the Clarence Thomas hearings — seems painfully quaint in the post-Bush II era of lying-on-steroids (SuperPAC, the new comic book hero!). Almost 20 years later, and the alternate universe of lies seems to be where more than half the country wants to live.
These days I am often struck by the seemingly freakish prescience of things I read from the 1990s (or, more self-referentially, from the early days of Printculture). I wonder if it’s just because things don’t change as fast as we think they do, or because people are just becoming more and more terrible.
On the other hand: gay marriage!
OK, I’m editing the title of the post to make it less depressing. Thanks, E!
This week I am teaching _The Female Man_ by Joanna Russ (1975). This is an amazing, radical, sf, feminist book that shows the same woman in 4 parallel worlds, including one that’s very close to 1970s America. As recently as 3 years ago, it sadly did not seem dated a day. This year, it seems a little bit dated. By that I mean that only most of its angriest concerns about how women are excluded from personhood still ring true, rather than all of them. Today I choose to find this progress gratifying.
Thanks for the comment, onela22. Sounds like an interesting, if discouraging, read. We gotta find hope where we can get it, right?